@Highway ally doesn't care as long as the drain rate is too low cos they obviously out number us. When the repair rate was 5 and 10 they still complained. Now the repair rate is set to as low as 1 and no complain? Why so? Because they obviously out number us and kill , one person is enough to heal the camps when we die and everyone wait at dv camps.
You seems like an attacker in that server.
1 year ago when I was an Eu 1 player ...and didnt really understand the game instruction and game well so I just join any mapholder clan. They would have a long list of rules and regulations in their own discord.
Losing 20k DDs is something big to you?
I don’t think they’re realizing how hard and slow it is to repair a site with a +1/s rate. Maybe their tactics aren’t that good after all
You’re currently replying to a guy making alts on forum following his in game alt names
The defender alliance reacts in seconds as they are in a discord call, draining takes 6 minutes with this speed (on excellent gates, which are rare and alliance tends to keep them on lower yield). There is basically no point to try, it was hard enough with 4 minute drain time (remember, 0 or 1 gate taken during that whole update). Repair also takes only 1 player, even a low level or an alt can do it, so the defenders can still move freely.
Lost dds isn't the matter here but losing it where it's not even worth trying is. If it's so easy why don't u show us how to drain a gate which is 100 or 200% or infact 400% with -8hp where the defenders are 100 members?
The reason for the update is help the attackers Right? Well the attackers before New update hold maps now they can't take buildings so the devs should support the attackers and not Kill their moral and lose 40 people from game and Kill it
Idk why you love eu 1 so much man .. don't disturb that "penguin club" server man. There are other server worth your attention not just eu 1
You mean gold that can be extracted without the need to get into PVP?
Expect if I am correct and you refer to ores around claims dv is pvp free zone so how would that work
You simply get duellist in dinoville in this way and allowing also low levels/new players to get golds/fame
forum.dinostorm.com
why not just make it for all servers instead of eu1? this just seems biasedWe drafted a concept to have dynamic drain rate based on the clan owned sites as we already mentioned here. Unfortunatly its not ready to be tested yet though. Check it out the concept and drop your feedback there:
Feedback Wanted: Site Conflict Adjustments (3.2)
Hey everyone, we think it's a good idea to give this adjustment idea an extra post so that we can have a focused discussion on it. Please let us know what you think of this concept and feel free to drop your constructive feedback below! Site Conflict Adjustments (3.2) Site Yield Changes...
For EU1:
We will go back to the -20 and +5 rate for now as this ensured a gameplay for both side. I know its hard to defend the tank attacker strategy but they barely managed only to get 3 sites out of 65 max (only ~5%!) with a lot of dollar invenstment. The dominating alliance also pulls of strategies that could also not considered as "fair" against such a small opposition even when they are in the majority on the server. I hope both sides understand this and can swhy till enjoy combat vs. none until the next update is ready to go live.
I can understand that but its like that because EU1 is very different to other server structures. Its just temporary until the proposed concept is ready to go live, which hopefully balances it better naturally.
well its okay,eu1 will just keep gates at basic and good percentage and this wont affect them,lose lose
Then the attackers in that server simply will farm gold from PvE.
they wont be able to,ppl in the alliance farms gold as well and wont let enemy
@Highway thanks alot! Waiting for the dynamic rates too. Finally u understood our problems <3.We drafted a concept to have dynamic drain rate based on the clan owned sites as we already mentioned here. Unfortunatly its not ready to be tested yet though. Check it out the concept and drop your feedback there:
Feedback Wanted: Site Conflict Adjustments (3.2)
Hey everyone, we think it's a good idea to give this adjustment idea an extra post so that we can have a focused discussion on it. Please let us know what you think of this concept and feel free to drop your constructive feedback below! Site Conflict Adjustments (3.2) Site Yield Changes...
For EU1:
We will go back to the -20 and +5 rate for now as this ensured a gameplay for both side. I know its hard to defend the tank attacker strategy but they barely managed only to get 3 sites out of 65 max (only ~5%!) with a lot of dollar invenstment. The dominating alliance also pulls of strategies that could also not considered as "fair" against such a small opposition even when they are in the majority on the server. I hope both sides understand this and can still enjoy combat vs. none until the next update is ready to go live.
the problem still is the fact we can't attack at any hour we want and that the game play is restricted to the times imposed by you, making a boring and predictable gameplay without surprisesWe drafted a concept to have dynamic drain rate based on the clan owned sites as we already mentioned here. Unfortunatly its not ready to be tested yet though. Check it out the concept and drop your feedback there:
Feedback Wanted: Site Conflict Adjustments (3.2)
Hey everyone, we think it's a good idea to give this adjustment idea an extra post so that we can have a focused discussion on it. Please let us know what you think of this concept and feel free to drop your constructive feedback below! Site Conflict Adjustments (3.2) Site Yield Changes...
For EU1:
We will go back to the -20 and +5 rate for now as this ensured a gameplay for both side. I know its hard to defend the tank attacker strategy but they barely managed only to get 3 sites out of 65 max (only ~5%!) with a lot of dollar invenstment. The dominating alliance also pulls of strategies that could also not considered as "fair" against such a small opposition even when they are in the majority on the server. I hope both sides understand this and can still enjoy combat vs. none until the next update is ready to go live.
"Dislike" and "like" don't mean much if these people don't give valid arguments as to why they disagree.
