I think the problem consists more in the lack of opportunities to satisfy everyone. That's the core of the issue at least.
äh no plan that i know about so far about that, but quite a valid point.
So I was thinking about consolidating this prospective through some estimates.
i think this reward concept is nice, i had similar idea
these calculations seem to be logic, though for me your calculation dont look really real, but i calculated in other way how much sheriffs could be there per 28 days and it got somewhere 4.5, so i guess your 4.61 number is correct
Summation of tokens earned by office multiplied by how often it is repeated in 28 days per office multiplied by how many offices there are.... Not sure what went wrong there
I double checked. The accurate value is exactly 4.611834585 or approximately 4.61. Double check your calculations, minor calculation mistakes could happen.
Totally agreed, and the shop should include items that are tempting enough to distract players from making Tyrannosaurus Rex their sole priority. All while still keeping it an accessible option for those who still want to get Tyrannosaurus Rex anyway.
I don't see this an a bad thing honestly, more rex's given out means more people get the chance to enjoy. As stated it is giving everyone an opportunity to get rex. (although it would be a very long time without an alliance or controlling buildings) Big clans will give their fame to players for higher tier elections, the bottom ones will be open to nearly everyone.
you would devalue the rex
With high value of Dino dollars and minimum fame required to join a high election office which is essential to obtain a Tyrannosaurus Rex, it will be more expensive than ever before, considering also that players will be forced to lose time after time until they finally receive that opportunity.
How much does it cost? 1M dollars?
You can't walk through a map in our server without seeing multiple people with rex, at the point in the game's lifespan rex isnt "rare".
yea its possible, but now it will be way harder. you will be able to steal fame and try block them, by stealing enemies have less fame and you have more. depending what lvl mobs will spawn during pve attacks it may be hard to defend several maps, so it will require more attention what may make holding many maps of towers harder.
@Highway @Alewx @GruniTENGO EN MI PODER, UNA IDEA QUE SOLUCIONARA COMPLETAMENTE EL COMBATE PVP
(Agradeceria que la comunidad traduciera esto a otros idiomas)View attachment 41746
Como jugadores, todos sabemos que a veces hacerle "click" a un enemigo para poder atacarlo, no es suficiente. Ni siquiera con la opción de acción rápida mezclando las teclas ("CTRL" + "CLICK DERECHO") para atacar, esto a veces se debe a varios factores:
1- El enemigo se mueve muy rápido (en caso del coelophisis o implante de resistencia)
2- En las guerras hay MUCHAS PERSONAS amontonadas y puedes equivocarte y apuntar a un aliado o un enemigo que no quieres atacar.
3- La "hitbox" del enemigo es MUY PEQUEÑA (Me refiero al área para hacerle "click" a un enemigo)
Esto sucede por ejemplo con el coelophisis o dinosaurios pequeños, tienen "Hitbox" pequeñas por lo tanto es MAS DIFÍCIL de hacerle "click" a diferencia de un Rex o Brachiosaurus (Este problema se INCREMENTA INCREÍBLEMENTE CON DINOSAURIOS CON ALTA RESISTENCIA)
4- LAG
5- Jugadores sin "Mouse"
---> Estos problemas causan ventajas injustas en las peleas, ya que no puedes apuntar a un enemigo por su velocidad o porque esta entre una masa de gente, el enemigo te atacara primero y no podrás ganarle, porque empezaras a atacarlo 10 segundos después que el iniciara, solamente porque tu "Click" no fue lo suficientemente agudo para atraparlo.
S O L U C I Ó N:
View attachment 41747
He visto la interés de los desarolladores en implementar nuevas actualizaciones al juego, un ejemplo de ello, ademas del "rework" de habilidades, el MODO ESPECTADOR (Apretar "ALT" + "SUPR") que permite el uso de una cámara libre tanto para la creatividad de vídeos y para curiosos en explorar los mapas.
-----> IMPLEMENTAR TECLA PARA MARCAR OBJETIVOS <------
Esta idea la he visto en varios videojuegos, les mostrare un ejemplo desde el videojuego "World Of Warcraft" (Lamentablemente el vídeo solo esta en ingles)
VER DEL SEGUNDO 34 hasta 1 minuto y 16 segundos (0:34 - 1:16 )
La implementación de esta tecla (En el caso de este juego mostrado es apretando "TAB")
Cambiaría COMPLETAMENTE las batallas, siendo mas justas al poder elegir al enemigo correcto sin los problemas antes mencionados.
Han agregado el "MODO ESPECTADOR" agradecería enormemente que esta idea se pueda implementar para crear batallas mas justas entre todos
GRACIAS!
Make an PTR server, so we can test out this updateWe are thankful for all the incoming feedback, as it is both important and valuable for Dino Storm development. The suggestions you’ve sent us so far have shown us that our plans for adjusting the game’s maps would not really affect the root of the issues at hand, and therefore not have the effects desired by the community.
Although there are many different facets and perspectives to your feedback, most of you wrote about attacking and controlling sites in order to earn fame and ultimately be elected Sheriff in the town hall, which also provides access to the precious tyrannosaurus rex. However, the most obvious aspects in gameplay are not always the ones at the root of the problem, which is why we attempt to dig deeper and gain additional analytical data—from the game, testers and GMs alike. This way, we want to reach the core of the issue. Going from the observations we have made so far, we are not convinced that revising the game’s maps alone would improve gameplay enough to be satisfactory.
In the last few days we had been intensively discussing a number of design iterations and concepts—but the further we went and discussed possible solutions, the more it became obvious that we would actually need to think about changing the main gameplay path for unlocking T-Rex. We already had ideas for changing the endgame mechanics and concepts on our to-do list, and now we needed to figure out whether we will have to tackle these ideas before or after any potential map adjustments are made.
We condensed the list of issues and points that need to be addressed down to:
- Server-spanning alliances misusing their influence, deciding who gets and doesn’t get the T-Rex
- Stalling endgame as soon as T-Rex has been unlocked
- Rather boring and predictable gameplay around sites (Travel Gates, Claims)
Let us know what you think, or if we are missing important key points!
Edit: Link to Early concept
i think nothing is done yet, all what devs presented were just concepts. devs wanted to get feedback first to do right things right away, not change them several times. ptr for sure should be made to test this update.
Well said @Highway .We are thankful for all the incoming feedback, as it is both important and valuable for Dino Storm development. The suggestions you’ve sent us so far have shown us that our plans for adjusting the game’s maps would not really affect the root of the issues at hand, and therefore not have the effects desired by the community.
Although there are many different facets and perspectives to your feedback, most of you wrote about attacking and controlling sites in order to earn fame and ultimately be elected Sheriff in the town hall, which also provides access to the precious tyrannosaurus rex. However, the most obvious aspects in gameplay are not always the ones at the root of the problem, which is why we attempt to dig deeper and gain additional analytical data—from the game, testers and GMs alike. This way, we want to reach the core of the issue. Going from the observations we have made so far, we are not convinced that revising the game’s maps alone would improve gameplay enough to be satisfactory.
In the last few days we had been intensively discussing a number of design iterations and concepts—but the further we went and discussed possible solutions, the more it became obvious that we would actually need to think about changing the main gameplay path for unlocking T-Rex. We already had ideas for changing the endgame mechanics and concepts on our to-do list, and now we needed to figure out whether we will have to tackle these ideas before or after any potential map adjustments are made.
We condensed the list of issues and points that need to be addressed down to:
- Server-spanning alliances misusing their influence, deciding who gets and doesn’t get the T-Rex
- Stalling endgame as soon as T-Rex has been unlocked
- Rather boring and predictable gameplay around sites (Travel Gates, Claims)
Let us know what you think, or if we are missing important key points!
Edit: Link to Early concept
armor, shield and def lower dmg by %
Would it be fine if for an PVE attack chance would be even higher at time when there are most online players (during the day and the evening) and lower at time when the least players are online (nights and mornings) either from the whole server or clan which is holding certain towers or just based on server time? In this way i think it still will stay random as you want, but at same time players would be aware too when their towers could be attacked with certain chances
