Well then attackers won't really take as much sites anymore, it'll be harder for them, and defenders will actually defend though, but there's gonna be complaints, so have your doubts that such feature won't be implemented
Well devs will not consider that althrought you're right. In that case it would solve the passive draining/afk draining because the attackers would have to actually kill the defenders to keep draining gates. But it's been already said that it would've been unfair for the attackers (SMH)
Whatever adjustment is made, attackers will capture fewer portals anyway.
We only share our experiences from our servers, no? We shared eu2 issues and eu1 ones, not necessarily our fault that most of the people complaining here are from one of these servers.
Yes, it would be the most feasible way to force the pvp. In the same way, you would also have to pay attention to the portals because they go down just as fast if there are no defenders, but nobody wants that because alparacer doesn't like doing pvp in a gun game xdd
medal.tv
Maybe, just maybe by not staying in ccvbandicam 2024-06-07 01-51-32-941.mp4 - Clipped with Medal.tv
86 Views. Watch bandicam 2024-06-07 01-51-32-941.mp4 and millions of other Dino T Rex M videos captured using Medal.
https://medal.tv/pl/games/dino-t-re...d1337oyatLzu?invite=cr-MSx0Y0UsMjEzNjU0MTM0LA
How exactly is that defendable ?
Where's your gates hard to get now
it's not her site obviously though, why would she bother running to a site which is a lost one already? Not even god could save it, the drain speed is insane that's all about it, it was alright when allies could kill the attackers, but now it's not even close to that
First 2 for every clan, no, they aren't hard. Anything more than that is hard, just as I said.
your reasoning is true, but it is also true that since you are allies you have an obligation to help defend Dxrk Rise members and kill their enemies, but these are your decisions. I respect your point of view, but as far as clan vs clan based update is concerned it is correct for adrenaline buff , and the draining speed is right for clans that have many towers
An alliance should help each other, no? Oh, nvm, they are too greedy and just camp their own.
That's the point of the update, one clan will struggle to hold too many sites
Yes, and I don't have a problem with that, I like this update. You and your cronies on the other hand are begging for any kind of nerf on attackers because we took *shock* SEVEN buildings and that the drain rate is fast on clans that don't want to divide.
the issue is less that eu1 players are sharing their experiences and more that the eu1 players are dragging their server fight into a thread that's supposed to be about feedback for the game. literally on almost every page y'all are duking it out. i see and agree with points on both sides but god y'all are exhausting.
Bruhh all the fight is for rex and winning elections and not everyone has rex , +rex doing highest damage. Every dino has got its speciality, what u want is rex doing highest damage along with brachi health so u can win against attackers in PvP? U have skill issue get that resolved.
I see no owner clan member defending why?
I feel like the reason for this is that whenever ppl do post idea and opinion there are certain people that sit on their computer all day watching this thread like the monkey from toy story 3 just so they can instantly disagree and mock. Therefore others are trying to justify their idea with reasons. Of course that's not possible as the other half refuses to listen and isn't getting banned anyway. Therefore it just becomes blunt arguing
My question was replied by those whom it wasn't addressed to. Yet the ones that it were addressed to simply ignored it.
And realistically how many Sites can you capture when you don't have the necessary manpower anyway?
I agree on that, it started to become frustrating trying to find and read real feedbacksFor every 1 pages on feedback on EG3.2 there is 5 pages of eu1 crying and arguing.... Filter them eu1 baddies outta here @Faye
You can Actually test that out on the PTR.
Block status effect?
