@Alewx u jolly well already know this night phase will only benefit the defender and mapholder. And you agree with my point both party should have the roleplay of being both defender and attacker...what course of action will you take to make sure the community get that?
this is correct, but in fact it will still prevent everyone from enjoying the war, this phase change was definitely unnecessary
The server im in there was a genuine fair war where times were unpredictable we lose sometimes we win....this phase just removed the hope of us getting any fame and fun....like morning phase ive got the edge over enemy, afternoon me and enemy were equal in power.... Night time enemy had edge over us... Its like up and down non stagnant shift of power making things fun..... With this new implementation...., ill just get run down by the other party everytime i log in their prime timing phase.....
It is not up to me to decide alone.
Obviously the news announcement agree to disagree ration is very much evident the community has decided thats its not very appealing.... We the community are the ones playing the game.... Not the devs...
EU1 is not representing the other servers dynamics. But lots of eu1 players are posting here. Perhaps when players from other servers will post they will also mention the server where they're playing. But nobody can force people who mainly play on EU1 to care about any other servers . Live long and prosper.
1 thing im not understanding why other servers always complain that eu1 always posts about the updates, but what is stopping other servers from also posting? if eu1 is actively playing/testing/posting why u wanna blame them for spamming, im from am2 and im posting, idk where everyone else is from and tbh idc but we shouldnt get butthurt because our servers arent on forum posting like others are
Obviously other server are feeling the balanced in power and have the thrill of winning and losing... All eu 1 wants is total domination and will whine and spam forum of endless of days...and of course due to language barrier the america server cant voice their opinion ...
sorry but this would be just an excuse, im spanish yet im here, if someone cant write in english they can write in their language or use google translate and paste it here and to say other servers are feeling the balanced in power its a lie, most america servers also swap gates when phase starts this issue is not eu1 based, its a universal issue being abused by everyone not just alliances or call it defender clans, also attackers swap gates, u may hate eu1 or whatever idc and i dont even want to know anything about eu1 but everyone keeps spamming oh but eu1.. and eu1... but... bro nobody cares they are a server and they are people who are posting here, nobody holds ur hand or anyone's everyone is free to come here and post their opinion
We also dont decide over forum like/dislikes etc or pollsDont worry we can monitor many aspects and see if the data matches the feedback or not. We dont take any feedback without verifying it. BTW: Already missed your thoughful feedback, but can understand it gets tiring when the same stuff is written over and over here
1. Not as difficult as it is stated here. If you upgrade your site HP to max level and keep your owned sites protected with defenders before the conflict starts it can be defended. Most conflicts we watched live were decided by the amount of attackers vs defenders. Many defenders only showed in small numbers when the site was lost. Relying in the ally will not work anymore (it is also not desired by design). (Adrenaline buff is there for this to limit their impact)
But nevertheless defence is a bit to difficult. Something we will fine tune for sure.
2. Jup that is true and we will look at that timings.
3. Yes also not ideal and we are looking into this as well. But we also saw that this is also countered by enemy clans right now to get many sites as well. So in the end it does not help the ally as much.
4. Yes but this is not a big issue as it helps to reduce ally support. Its rare that two clans fight each other for a building. There are plenty on a map and they can target another one. (at least this issue is at low priority)
5. Its what you make out of it. PVP itself is not touched apart from balancing some OP aspects.
only more restrictions and conditions are now observed in the gameI case this was lost in all the spamming:
We also dont decide over forum like/dislikes etc or polls
Currently are in evaluation of several ideas and possibly found one simple yet effective solution. Stay tuned.
How can attacker peak if u removed time phase where we peak?
I see a contradiction, because everything is based on time, if time is increasingly longer, fewer actions can be carried out by the attackers
This needs to happen for attacker to be able to hold site for more than 1 count
So what is going to happen to a site if it is reclaimed each time? Is the fame going to accumulate inside of it? And then when someone is finally able to defend it for 1 phase, they could take out all the fame the site has produced over the course of however many phases it was active but "traded" each time? Or is the fame inside of the site going to reset each time it is reclaimed before anyone could take it's fame?
servers who swap gates don't do it for the fame tho, they don't want to risk paying 83k dd [not counting what they pay trying to defend it] to lose their site afterwards bcs in most cases they will lose it so they swap not caring about fame production
i strongly disagree bcs longer draining = longer battles for the site + keep in mind right now you have 1.5 hrs phase x3 and they are in a row, u can be prepared and u can choose to attack for example in the middle phase, and not when it starts, u can still surprise attack defender clans even during peak conflict phases, surely not like the past but its possible still. there is many methods to surprise attack a defender clan even with current updates, having a phase during midnight or early morning where most player base is offline isnt really "competing" to capture a site from a clan but during peak server time it brings serious competition as most are available to attack/defend but right now servers still swap
Its more a finetuning in the timings overall to not let the conflict not end to early and give the defenders a bit more time to react. Keep in mind it will benefit attacker as well as they need to defend themselves to earn fame from sites.
If the owner of the site changes the contained items will get destroyed as it does currently. Accumulating it would lead to expolits. Means no rewards for anyone if no one defends. Mockup:
Hmm if that is the case they will swap sides for nothing?
Ok so what happens when site that is held for more than 1 conflict and it gets lost you will make that attacker also need to hold it for at least to claim fame as well?
basically yes for nothing, they give up on defending so they swap more like becoming "attackers" instead of defenders and remember basic gate only gives 700 fame so even that means nothing logically
That's a good idea to prevent abusing site swapping, but do you think people want to site swap and make negligible fame? I think both attackers and defenders don't like the fact that almost all servers are at 50% and no one is making fame. I think it would be better to address the root issue that the gameplay is flawed and forces everyone into keeping gates at 50%.
i guess yes, attackers will be forced to defend as well if they want to earn fame, so earning fame from conflicts will be more difficult and not "free" anymore bcs then both sides need to defend
To be honest, i have huge doubts that these few 83k DD are actually that much of a cause, in the relation to the amount that gets burned during a conflict that is less than peanuts.
nah i dont say 83k is a lot, basicailly in 30-50mins u can farm over 100k dd [with vio]
