I don't see the problem here when this currently happend on dominant clans specially on leaders and where more is noticed is when they lose the control without that player wining the election, and nobody care or complain about that xd
And your opinion is bias, because unlike you, I didn't push for reforms that is going to effect everyone, not just me or those who matters to me. I push for a free-gameplay where everyone can choose their own style. If they want total war, they can have that, and if they want stable foundation for peace, it should be allowed too.
idk if i understood this questions, but what i meant was all invested fame, if player is on first place then all his invested should be shown.
Slejd do u have gova or rex man ?idk if i understood this questions, but what i meant was all invested fame, if player is on first place then all his invested should be shown.
i got what you were talking about saying players can save fame - they would collect fame, but invest needed amount only at the end of the election, so its quite valid point to be considered. maybe showing invested and owned amount of fame of players who applied to the election maybe should be
€ 1.00 = R$ 6.50, am i a joke to you?
Or u are a kid thirsty for election and go act like this and if after get harder u will come and cry to back it as it was ?
what you are talking about?? long - life gel is useful when you use it before supplying towers and A class gel (which lats 1h) is easily obtained either by hunting or just buying with 1 gc, the rest are harder to get but at same time more risky to use in peaceful time, on wars ofc B and C classes are most useful. when you have used it you can supply towers with higher % not minding if it is war or not. as i have seen on both eu2 and eu3 servers if players are online, they wait for towers to get down to ~65% and then they supply, that you use them only during war is your bad choice
Ok, so what are you going to do if you have invested in election with for example 1 million fame, and a random opponent that you don't know who he is invested with 10k fame, then with 30 seconds before the evalution period ends, he have invested with 1 million fame, and now have in total 1.01M fame while you have only 1M and you lose office and 75% of the invested fame, and you receive around 250K fame?
i do and i talked about it before and if you think that i wont care about elections, you would be wrong because since there will be exclusive store i will try to get tokens in any way
So u care for ur tokens ego things bcz u have rex welll at least some lesders and rexes think for the next ones also not ourselfs
im not sure if you checked the second part but there i agreed that it should be considered that maybe both owned fame and invested fame would be shown and i too agreed before that receiving back 25% of fame is too less
Or just show the name of the clan whose member is competing with your own member, so that you can seize what they have, reducing how much their member have, and increasing how much your member have. (If you prefer War) or you can just speak to the leader of that clan and tell him to talk to his member to leave the office, and solve the situation through diplomacy (If you prefer peace).maybe showing invested and owned amount of fame of players who applied to the election maybe should be
i care too, i have some in-game friends who cant afford elections bcs monopolists took the server and it seems for me you are drunk or either your english or translator are bad
lmfao i'm lazy because i don't want to worry about fame again as the endgame when i already got my rex almost 4 years ago? ok buddy.
The reforms are maked by devs not by me, and also you aren't thinking on the players from your server that want fame, elections and war if you don't like that then play with protection and left them to have the zones. Also the total peace is imposible because is imposible to like to everyone, the problem rigth now is that is imposible to go against a bigger alliance as must happend on your eu1 and ame1 so enemy players endup leaving. Is that fair? Is that free to play when your alliance spend tons of gold having maps?. I don't see any difference on your argument to those that wants rex to be free xd
if showing then i think it would be better to show the actual player, not a clan. maybe player who applied for elections may not want to tell that he did join and i think there would be no way to discover who joined, unless adding something what would show for clanmates who joined which election
That is the function of the tokens and your store, whether or not you have a rex, will keep you active to get the items available in the store and their updates.
This is a preview of what you want to change, of course there will be a test and refinement before reaching the live servers, as well as previous updates, this is just the first step for more superficial feedbacks. You speak as if you were going to be implanted the way it is written there, I cannot understand this type of reasoning. @Highway if possible I would like you to intervene here, showing your intentions in relation to the issues discussed and if you can show us the changes that you failed to present, as this discussion does not lead anywhere.
Yes, sorry
I can't believe I read this
The clan leader/Right hands can see who from his members joined which election to help them with fame.
Like it or not, many many people agree with me.I can't believe I read this
The same people who are currently in great alliances, change my mind.
I agree with you actually, but don't you see that at least 80% of Dino storm players are members of great alliances? Yet not all of them agree with me.
