This is a tricky question. If price to unlock is too high then high level players won't use the gate as much as low level players. Meaning low level players can have bigger role in war in the first 3 maps. (Advantage to attacker)
ah yes, I've heard about you, provoked almost everyone on your alliance on the last day of your gov@Highway Apart from that, I will tell you something more:
Early on, I was kicked out in the final day of my governor election because of a rumor told by someone to my clan to make me leave) Someone betrayed my trust in the process. Since then I'm struggling to win my governor for 2 and half years until now. in this span of time I helped many dominant clans and stay loyal to each one..
During the time, losing clans misused me by giving me fake promise on my elections after helping them winning back their gates. (the player (co-leader) left the server and didn't care to fulfill his promise.)
(present) Then I supported dominant clan.. they promised me elections (a deal I made with their leader) then later they make me leave my past alliance and they succeeded in manipulating me with another desperate fake lie..
My point is, leaders misuse players with giving fake promises and deals during when the leader is desperate in winning back gates and unfortunately the (also desperate player) believes those promises which the leaders fail to fulfill and act like nothing happened after the war.
Therefore I believe, a player must be able to win their elections without the need of any middlemen. (leaders, right hand, etc)
And the alliance system is just serving the leaders friends and their agendas and they decide our fate of the game.. this needs to be changed for players like me who wait for 2 or more years who try their best to win elections but our fate lies in people who misuse us and only have priorities for their friends first no matter if their friends help lesser than us..
I wish independency on all the players of the game so that they can control their own destiny and equal rewards for working hard without anyone interfering. Thanks for reading!
Dude are you really here crying in the forum of a dinosaur game because of a position in elections? Look honestly, this update will be happen just because a group of people like you who complains from everything and it seems that they dev team only hear bad ideas, this forum its crowded a full of good idea and the dev team catch me soon as bad my God, whether or not you caught or not the governor in the game is your problem, complain here on the forum will not help you in absolutely nothing friend KKKKKKKKK
Hello, there is nothing more important than winning the precious rex in the game. Your comment against me is weak because I'm speaking about a direct problem which affects the town hall elections of the player because it revolves around lies and deception of the leader and their friends!
Yes, the question is that after ten long years they want to change the way they earn rex? Unnecessary, there is a lot to put in this game after the endgame and I doubt very much that most like this future update, it will be equal to balancing and what's the point of testing all these things being that when they test on public server people just come in for fun, anyway.. Things are just going to get even more complicated and then there's going to be more people complaining and that I'm sure
This issue wouldn't have been raised unless majority of players have been suffering like me or worse! Majority of players wait for many years just for a rex or worse they lose hope.. because they follow a clueless path in hoping, expecting and depending on a few people who run the townhall unfairly and only to their desires! I'm speaking from my experience. Logically speaking, We should not expect or depend on someone for our elections, that is unhealthy! For the game and for the mind because they get to control us. We should strive for rex in a way where no one can interfere. Thanks for reading, Elena.
*sad election block noises*
you were changing clan every 2 weeks lol
Well to combat the unfair advantage that comes from difference in numbers a penalty should be added upon dying multiple time in a row. Let's be honest, the penalty of dropping 1000 dd upon death doesn't really hurt anyone who plays the game daily even for a level 55 you farm 1000dd in a minute. Below is a list of what i think would be :- Appropriate penalties of dying while having duelist.
this would be even worse, if there would be situation that 10 players are fighting with other 5, then those 5 would die more often and than those 10 and it would be getting worse for those 5 with every battle, so your idea would just cause opposite of what you think it would do
It is necessary to change the system of fame/portals. This ends any alliance. I just don't know how
Fair point, it should change in a way that doesn't kills the game monetization. The devs are giving us a new election system(phase 2/3), lets take a look at how it affects the current alliances before we discuss about any further changes.
I have reflected on what you said and instead of a temporary decrease in stats, a decrease in fame might be more appropriate.
More one @slejd2001there is no way to end big alliances, players will find a way to keep doing it
#sincerity
as it's mentioned above, elections.
No one can say anything without you intruding, right?
No one can say anything without you intruding, right?
so let's go you smart, what would be your big idea to end alliances in the game?
skins!! More skins pls!!
I very much like this type of synergy. Although it would require a bit of work so that this idea becomes perfect, I'd really love for that to happen.
forum.dinostorm.com
that's me running around changing skins when my clan mates are freaking out and calling for 1 more player
LOL same! I'm a trash player
