You forgot the entire war was because ally decide to take the buildings that belong to us and that's the whole point of war.ok you took the buildings because you can attack anytime you want,now how will you make the fame? because that means clans can just collect whenever they want if there is no attack phase,you just care about taking the gate but not taking the fame? you forgot that the entire point of taking gates is to take the fame in them right?
that is correct but what is also being undermined is that some attackers are maximum 5-6 people trying to hold gates which is by game standards impossibleWhile I haven't opened this forum for 2 weeks, I come back to see the same people from the same server ridiculing the update while all changes are done with the attacker's advantage in mind.
Maybe the problem isn't really the update but it's up to attackers to form new strategies to steal fame now.
didnt you attack the ally first and thats why you lost your gates..? we are talking about game system why are u crying that you lost ur gates from the ally?You forgot the entire war was because ally decide to take the buildings that belong to us and that's the whole point of war.
Basically the update was to make smaller clans to get camps and u say 7 members can't take it then how does the update help smaller clans. U just contradict the whole reason for the update.the entire system was made around the idea of gates having certain attack period,you are asking to change the entire system to fit your clan this is stupid
if you consider 7 people a clan,then so be it,even with this update 7 people can take gates against alliances that have triple their size which is considered fair?Basically the update was to make smaller clans to get camps and u say 7 members can't take it then how does the update help smaller clans. U just contradict the whole reason for the update.
Did I consider or u just said 7? And ofc this convo is about making system more fair. What's the reason for making the travel sickness to 1min can u give any reason? What's the reason the ally exchange the camps? Can u give reason?if you consider 7 people a clan,then so be it,even with this update 7 people can take gates against alliances that have triple their size which is considered fair?
the reason for the 1m travel sickness is to stop attack spamming,an attacker dies and then just spam revive and attack which gives zero chance for defenders to defend their gate.you want the game to be fair to the point defenders cant defend their gate?Did I consider or u just said 7? And ofc this convo is about making system more fair. What's the reason for making the travel sickness to 1min can u give any reason? What's the reason the ally exchange the camps? Can u give reason?
and ally exchanging gates isnt effective and not everyone does itDid I consider or u just said 7? And ofc this convo is about making system more fair. What's the reason for making the travel sickness to 1min can u give any reason? What's the reason the ally exchange the camps? Can u give reason?
For ally it doesn't matter because they out number attacker even a level 20 player can repair the gate and high level can focus on high level attackerAlly also can't repair this 1 min travelsick, maybe yeah, need change it
even a level 20 player can also drain a gate,what is ur point?For ally it doesn't matter because they out number attacker even a level 20 player can repair the gate and high level can focus on high level attacker
Don't forget that it was taken for a reason. Every person that is being taken as enemy are people that either were toxic, mocking, trolling or trying to betray the alliance. And why letting a clan that wanted to betray everybody to "hold whole eu1" hold gates if they are taken as enemies. It is common senseYou forgot the entire war was because ally decide to take the buildings that belong to us and that's the whole point of war.
oh my god! so many gates were swapped! how could our 7 players special forces do anything now!!!@-Kiwi- stop swapping maps, it's not fair.. and I didn't screenshot ccv because that map is protected yeah, but 4 maps aren't enough I assume for fekete, they want more open maps although they aren't even attacking
You're right, but the opposite could also happenDon't forget that it was taken for a reason. Every person that is being taken as enemy are people that either were toxic, mocking, trolling or trying to betray the alliance. And why letting a clan that wanted to betray everybody to "hold whole eu1" hold gates if they are taken as enemies. It is common sense
We plan for attack when to and when not to. I just said now the freedom of planning attack isn't that good than before.i hope this shows everyone and the devs that people like this arent giving their feedback so they can help us make the game better,but to just benefit themselves and their current situation
So having all gates to urself helps everyone better on game ? Hmm oki hope this shows everyone and the devs that people like this arent giving their feedback so they can help us make the game better,but to just benefit themselves and their current situation
a clan that has 7 members cant hold gates,thats their issue has nothing to do with having all the gates to myself,you are just a weak clan and any weak clan in pvp gets crushed thats your fault but despite this you can still fight back and hold gates to stop cryingSo having all gates to urself helps everyone better on game ? Hmm ok