Feedback Thread · Endgame Part 3 Open PTR Test

[Pleiadian]

They said they will scale it based off of players that are active on the server.

It's scaled based on the applicant number in the Town Hall

 

[cOsMiNN]

Idk about that, I see many people here talking about working hard for stuff while those people didn't even bother ''working hard'' to get their own rex/elections and got it in some other ways if you know what I mean.

Okay

 

[IParzivaLI]

They said they will scale it based off of players that are active on the server.

They said it is based on town hall activity not active players

 

[..Arcadius..]

They said they will scale it based off of players that are active on the server.

Townhall applications, not active players.

Also another point here @Alewx and @Highway. If you expect sheriff players to have enough tokens for your new content in the future, how will they get any tokens if there are barely any gates and for sure priority will be given to players who don't have rex at all rather than players who have rex/sheriff and just want the extra content?

 

[cOsMiNN]

It's scaled based on the applicant number in the Town Hall

Then big clans need to destroy the big listing in order to send more people to elections in order to unlock more gates in order to damage alliances in a way. Does that make sense?

 

[Alewx]

This thread is quickly turning into conversational message.. there's just spam from what I see and i am missing some posts, nothing constructive or no feedback that's actually helping the game development.. is there any Gms or CMs online that can even moderate this thread?????

From front page what i can see only Evyus, Highway and Me, and I'm not for long here, getting back into bed and continue beeing sick, to hopefully return on monday fresh.

And while it beeing kind of Conversational, that is part of the process.

 

[Alewx]

It's scaled based on the applicant number in the Town Hall

And it is not set in sone with the numbers it has right now on the ptr. PTR is testing.

 

[piotr50000009]

From front page what i can see only Evyus, Highway and Me, and I'm not for long here, getting back into bed and continue beeing sick, to hopefully return on monday fresh.

And while it beeing kind of Conversational, that is part of the process.

man, just close this post at this point idk whatchu expecting, a head pat or pat on the back or sum idk

 

[-Kiwi-]

And again it encourages to do so because that's how players play nowadays, there isn't an ally system that they made is there? That means it most probably wasn't their intention that it would come out this way. Now, say everyone began acting as their own clan instead of alliances, and everyone fought for their own, the game would be much more fun and interesting wouldn't it? The changes they are making would actually make sense, and there would be more activity with the buildings, not just one name over 5 maps. Thing is, as I read before, this alliance thing makes things smooth and easy, everyone gets their election in time, their rex, sheriff, and nobody can be bothered as there are 100 players that defend my gate in case anything happens, and in case someone tries to steal my election, my clan owns an entire map. People got way too used to being lazy and owning everything.

bro people will ally in a pvp game its a stable what are you yapping about

 

[-Kiwi-]

Then big clans need to destroy the big listing in order to send more people to elections in order to unlock more gates in order to damage alliances in a way. Does that make sense?

there isnt enough fame for that

 

[Maggie Rhee]

From front page what i can see only Evyus, Highway and Me, and I'm not for long here, getting back into bed and continue beeing sick, to hopefully return on monday fresh.

And while it beeing kind of Conversational, that is part of the process.

You wanted a feedback over your amazing update, this is the feedback, enjoy it. Keep killing the game in such a great way.

 

[IParzivaLI]

I think that this thread is for us to complain about new update and stuff and for you to convince us this new update is good for us but it is absolutely not as you can see we complain about it

 

[-Kiwi-]

i think you and the devs forget that we actually need fame for elections

 

[-Kiwi-]

and by making dv hold gates means less fame you want to 'abolish waiting orders and distribute fame fairly'

 

[Maggie Rhee]

You devs playing on eu5 or am6 or do you play this game at all?

 

[piotr50000009]

@Alewx You ever played dino storm, like, ever? 1-55 no invincibility + rex elections? '-'

 

[cOsMiNN]

i think you and the devs forget that we actually need fame for elections

IF gates weren't so static, there wouldnt be billions bid in elections, because clans wouldn't make so much fame

 

[piotr50000009]

IF gates weren't so static, there wouldnt be billions bid in elections, because clans wouldn't make so much fame

So now 1 clan will hold all the gates since it's just 23 gates and nobody else will get any elections, yay!

 

[cOsMiNN]

bro people will ally in a pvp game its a stable what are you yapping about

 

[IParzivaLI]

IF gates weren't so static, there wouldnt be billions bid in elections, because clans wouldn't make so much fame

I dont think you understand that if we cant have gates we cant gain fame if we cant gain fame we cant apply on town hall if we cant apply on ton hall dv will hold gates if dv will hold gates there wont be any gates for us to hold if there is no gates for us to hold we wont have gates and it goes on and on

 

[-Kiwi-]

IF gates weren't so static, there wouldnt be billions bid in elections, because clans wouldn't make so much fame

the solution? just remove the gates and give them to dv i call that a job well done time to take a break!

 

[cOsMiNN]

So now 1 clan will hold all the gates since it's just 23 gates and nobody else will get any elections, yay!

Again, if clans send out multiple people in elections, more gates are available.

 

[piotr50000009]

Again, if clans send out multiple people in elections, more gates are available.

Then they just take them again? It's still mostly 23 gates, still 1 or 2 clans holding all the gates and nobody else got any chance, idk whatchu smoked but damnnnn

 

[cOsMiNN]

the solution? just remove the gates and give them to dv i call that a job well done time to take a break!

I don't agree with DV holding gates

 

[-Kiwi-]

Again, if clans send out multiple people in elections, more gates are available.

can i ask you a question? do you lead a clan? because if you do and if u lead a clan that has gates you would actually know that fame doesnt grow on trees

 

[IParzivaLI]

Again, if clans send out multiple people in elections, more gates are available.

Brooo if clans send more ppl to elections how are they supposed to in elections at all just common sense

 

[..Arcadius..]

Phantom wants cheaper fireworks

 

[Pleiadian]

If you expect sheriff players to have enough tokens for your new content in the future, how will they get any tokens if there are barely any gates and for sure priority will be given to players who don't have rex at all rather than players who have rex/sheriff and just want the extra content?

That's one of the important points that needs to be raised. The tower that we will have to fight for, will either be for players who do not have a Sheriff or players who have a Sheriff already.

And it's not really going to be pretty, because we wouldn't want the players who are fighting for their Sheriff to lose.

 

[-Kiwi-]

I don't agree with DV holding gates

thats our entire point,why are you fighting me then...

 

[Alewx]

and by making dv hold gates means less fame you want to 'abolish waiting orders and distribute fame fairly'

Buildings are organized and held by alliance anyway, and we need more buildings non the less no matter how much they push a single player in townhall?

If one alliance is pushing a single player into townhall than the fame from a few buildings is easier countered with the fame from the cloths or do you deny me that logic?