- Leyenda -
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2024
- Messages
- 103
- Reaction score
- 77
- Server
- America_5
- Main Char
- - Leyenda -
- Clan
- -GLadiadores-
I see many differences in this part 3 and they are:
Why not add the possibility of recovering a portal, that is, draining it again at the same time that the vulnerability is active? Because no one takes into account that players unfortunately do not play legally and can drain multis or that alliance players can drain them and the large clans would still remain with them for 24 hours.
Furthermore, this in the performance of the portals is too much Dds for a portal that can be lost in 10 minutes due to minimal carelessness or that several clans agree to drain only that portal to annoy the members of that clan, it is considered to be A good compensation is true but at an excessive price, it would be good to lower the price but also the production a little.
Thank you and please respond
Why not add the possibility of recovering a portal, that is, draining it again at the same time that the vulnerability is active? Because no one takes into account that players unfortunately do not play legally and can drain multis or that alliance players can drain them and the large clans would still remain with them for 24 hours.
Furthermore, this in the performance of the portals is too much Dds for a portal that can be lost in 10 minutes due to minimal carelessness or that several clans agree to drain only that portal to annoy the members of that clan, it is considered to be A good compensation is true but at an excessive price, it would be good to lower the price but also the production a little.
Thank you and please respond