i can see alliance smaller clan with 4 people having 4 gates with 400% . any question on that ?
The whole point of the last dynamic draining update was to force split big clans into smaller ones, you've been talking about this for 2 days and every time someone replies with the same thing
he just said about any player making a clan having 1 member in it can get the gate , so im talking about the alliance clan holdingh the gates with 4 players in it? is that wrong? alliance smaller clans can hold it , smaller clans not allied cannot hold it ?
They were shooting yes, but AFK. There's no movement or even ability usage, just standing and shooting, we of course have recordings etc. but nothing ever happens about it and I think we all know this by now
This update was released 7 days ago, it's not like Devs will magically pull out a solution for those problems.
Using brachi isn't exactly abuse because all players can use it either to defend or attack.
That's exactly the reason why players don't wanna attack back.
Because there is no need to fight back. It changes nothing whether you kill your opponent or not (as an attacker with the highest drain rate). You only care about damaging the site and your only way of doing that is surviving inside of the circle for as long as possible. Giving your opponents Extra Power can significantly increase their damage output, so tanks would rather focus on healing instead.
They finished draining the site while barely shooting defenders back, and no extra power has nothing to do with it since third parties can hardly do any damage on attackers, that's just another excuse for their own benefit. It's called common sense to realize this is another excuse for attackers (specifically fekete since they already replied to you with this excuse) to stand while barely fighting for the sake of a site. You should be watching yourself how the fights are happening on EU1 (sometimes on other servers too) and you'll see that most of the time attackers drain without pulling a fight, just standing and waiting/hoping to take the site. Once they finish taking the site, they just stand waiting for defenders to kill them so they can respawn somewhere else and restart the process once again, that's how the gameplay looks like nowadays, nothing fun about wars anymore honestly. At least some combat would require skills to win a battle, standing because "they don't want to charge defenders extra power" ain't some strategy or skill
Yes and that is how it should be. For that the adrenaline buff was introduced to make it fair between defender & attacker. So lets leave that out for now.
I'm not even complaining about it, my point is, there's no combat happening between attackers and defenders, it's just draining until attacker takes that site so they can move on to the next.
Dude ur problem is buff of 4x damage which makes other clans kill the attacker takes time.
But that also makes it difficult for different attacking groups to compete with each other. It only works if there are only 2 sides on a server (1 attacking clan/alliance and 1 defending clan/alliance). And even then the allies can make it hard for attackers by draining their friends' sites to swap peacefully. But what would happen if more independent groups joined the fight for sites? How do they compete for sites with other attacking groups when it takes so long to defeat them in the circle?
Also, about the extra power strategy attackers talk about, allies don't need attackers to give them extra power when allies can give extra power to each other...
To support this argument, let's take the example of the screenshot posted.
You can see 2 Branchi and 2 Para and the gate is not under attack (or already taken)
Yes thanks for highlighting about exchange again and yeah one small change needs to be added where real attacker n fake attacker can be differentiated so fake attacker won't get the buff ,thanks again for highlighting it.
I don't think it (Adrenaline Buffs) ever was meant for a third-party clan to attack a Site that's already under attack by another Site.
Do I understand this correctly? You are suggesting that the update that is supposed to "destroy alliances" will ideally end in ... players forming alliances again? Because essentially that's what happens when there is a peace between clans. I thought that we are trying to introduce chaos to the game - every man (or more likely a clan) for himself. But the attacker on attacker damage debuff does not support it.
I am convinced, that the person behind this account is a certified troll.
No I meant and this update meant clans fight for their own buildings and other clans can't do much here.
I said there should be difference between real attacker and fake attackers trying to misuse buff. There can be multiple real attacker clans getting buff while the fake attacker clan cannot get the buff.
1. What even is a fake attacker?
More about wars? Then why do you proceed to write that in the future, there should be an option where both the attacker and defender agree to peace?
And why would you want peace in the first place? You have been so vocal about the attacker's situation. You asked that attackers obtain more advantage, which has been the case.
This clearly means u haven't understood what I have written.
